tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3870801931584460413.post5680493168443694638..comments2024-01-03T11:08:42.595-08:00Comments on On Software and Languages: Named function arguments for C++, againMarek Krjhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16877868679118775297noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3870801931584460413.post-279242237817480552014-06-06T01:15:46.472-07:002014-06-06T01:15:46.472-07:00@Torsten
yes, that would be a nice feature!@Torsten<br />yes, that would be a nice feature!Marek Krjhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16877868679118775297noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3870801931584460413.post-48895656110781552392014-06-04T04:21:17.900-07:002014-06-04T04:21:17.900-07:00If you make both arguments different static types ...If you make both arguments different static types (for example by adding an unused, int template parameter), at least the compiler should complain, when you get the parameters wrong on the calling side.<br /><br />Cheers,<br />TorstenTorsten Robitzkihttp://robitzki.denoreply@blogger.com